« 锟斤拷锟节★拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷业锟揭★拷锟斤拷一锟斤拷锟斤拷实锟斤拷锟斤拷锟诫法 | 锟截碉拷锟斤拷页锟斤拷 | 锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟 »
February 08, 2007
锟斤拷锟斤拷Steve Jobs锟斤拷锟斤拷统媒锟斤拷0锟斤拷锟斤拷媒锟斤拷3
2锟斤拷6锟秸o拷苹锟斤拷锟斤拷站锟较挂筹拷锟斤拷一篇锟斤拷为Thoughts on Music锟斤拷锟斤拷锟铰o拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷Steve Jobs锟斤拷
锟斤拷然锟节癸拷锟节o拷blogger锟角对此凤拷应锟斤拷锟襟,碉拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷一锟斤拷锟斤拷炸锟斤拷锟铰硷拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟絁obs锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟街诧拷权锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷态锟饺o拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷些使锟斤拷iPod之锟解播锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷希锟斤拷锟斤拷锟脚达拷iTunes锟斤拷锟津到碉拷锟斤拷锟街碉拷锟矫伙拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷些锟斤拷iTunes之锟解购锟斤拷锟斤拷锟街o拷希锟斤拷锟斤拷iPod锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟矫伙拷锟斤拷锟解都锟角革拷锟叫硷拷值锟斤拷锟斤拷息锟斤拷
锟斤拷锟斤拷锟铰讹拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟叫癸拷锟斤拷锟揭的感达拷锟斤拷锟筋,没太锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟街憋拷拥母芯锟斤拷牵锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷碌锟斤拷锟斤拷郏锟斤拷锟酵趁斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷应锟斤拷
锟斤拷一锟轿o拷也锟斤拷锟斤拷2007锟斤拷1锟斤拷10锟秸o拷iPhone锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷一锟铰o拷为什么锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟絁obs锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷戏锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷志锟斤拷锟斤拷锟角o拷锟斤拷渭锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟揭伙拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷Fortune锟斤拷Time锟斤拷Newsweek通通锟斤拷锟斤拷锟揭伙拷未锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷帷o拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟矫斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟阶举的得凤拷锟剿o拷engadget锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟揭筹拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤到锟斤拷1000锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷平时PV锟斤拷4锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟劫o拷谁锟斤拷锟斤拷说锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷只锟角革拷blog锟斤拷
锟斤拷锟斤拷一锟轿o拷锟斤拷Jobs去Stanford锟捷斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷篇锟斤拷锟斤拷Stanford学校锟斤拷站锟较碉拷锟捷斤拷锟斤拷锟轿拷锟揭皇憋拷浔籩mail锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟铰o拷直锟斤拷2锟斤拷锟铰猴拷Fortune锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷挪锟斤拷锟斤拷锟剿硷拷锟剿碉拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷探缍硷拷锟絜mail锟斤发锟酵★拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷篇锟捷斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷要锟斤拷锟斤拷印锟斤拷锟斤拷志锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷要锟斤拷锟斤拷志锟较匡拷锟斤拷锟斤拷
Thoughts on Music
Steve Jobs
February 6, 2007
With the stunning global success of Apple锟斤拷s iPod music player and iTunes online music store, some have called for Apple to 锟斤拷open锟斤拷 the digital rights management (DRM) system that Apple uses to protect its music against theft, so that music purchased from iTunes can be played on digital devices purchased from other companies, and protected music purchased from other online music stores can play on iPods. Let锟斤拷s examine the current situation and how we got here, then look at three possible alternatives for the future.
To begin, it is useful to remember that all iPods play music that is free of any DRM and encoded in 锟斤拷open锟斤拷 licensable formats such as MP3 and AAC. iPod users can and do acquire their music from many sources, including CDs they own. Music on CDs can be easily imported into the freely-downloadable iTunes jukebox software which runs on both Macs and Windows PCs, and is automatically encoded into the open AAC or MP3 formats without any DRM. This music can be played on iPods or any other music players that play these open formats.
The rub comes from the music Apple sells on its online iTunes Store. Since Apple does not own or control any music itself, it must license the rights to distribute music from others, primarily the 锟斤拷big four锟斤拷 music companies: Universal, Sony BMG, Warner and EMI. These four companies control the distribution of over 70% of the world锟斤拷s music. When Apple approached these companies to license their music to distribute legally over the Internet, they were extremely cautious and required Apple to protect their music from being illegally copied. The solution was to create a DRM system, which envelopes each song purchased from the iTunes store in special and secret software so that it cannot be played on unauthorized devices.
Apple was able to negotiate landmark usage rights at the time, which include allowing users to play their DRM protected music on up to 5 computers and on an unlimited number of iPods. Obtaining such rights from the music companies was unprecedented at the time, and even today is unmatched by most other digital music services. However, a key provision of our agreements with the music companies is that if our DRM system is compromised and their music becomes playable on unauthorized devices, we have only a small number of weeks to fix the problem or they can withdraw their entire music catalog from our iTunes store.
To prevent illegal copies, DRM systems must allow only authorized devices to play the protected music. If a copy of a DRM protected song is posted on the Internet, it should not be able to play on a downloader锟斤拷s computer or portable music device. To achieve this, a DRM system employs secrets. There is no theory of protecting content other than keeping secrets. In other words, even if one uses the most sophisticated cryptographic locks to protect the actual music, one must still 锟斤拷hide锟斤拷 the keys which unlock the music on the user锟斤拷s computer or portable music player. No one has ever implemented a DRM system that does not depend on such secrets for its operation.
The problem, of course, is that there are many smart people in the world, some with a lot of time on their hands, who love to discover such secrets and publish a way for everyone to get free (and stolen) music. They are often successful in doing just that, so any company trying to protect content using a DRM must frequently update it with new and harder to discover secrets. It is a cat-and-mouse game. Apple锟斤拷s DRM system is called FairPlay. While we have had a few breaches in FairPlay, we have been able to successfully repair them through updating the iTunes store software, the iTunes jukebox software and software in the iPods themselves. So far we have met our commitments to the music companies to protect their music, and we have given users the most liberal usage rights available in the industry for legally downloaded music.
With this background, let锟斤拷s now explore three different alternatives for the future.
The first alternative is to continue on the current course, with each manufacturer competing freely with their own 锟斤拷top to bottom锟斤拷 proprietary systems for selling, playing and protecting music. It is a very competitive market, with major global companies making large investments to develop new music players and online music stores. Apple, Microsoft and Sony all compete with proprietary systems. Music purchased from Microsoft锟斤拷s Zune store will only play on Zune players; music purchased from Sony锟斤拷s Connect store will only play on Sony锟斤拷s players; and music purchased from Apple锟斤拷s iTunes store will only play on iPods. This is the current state of affairs in the industry, and customers are being well served with a continuing stream of innovative products and a wide variety of choices.
Some have argued that once a consumer purchases a body of music from one of the proprietary music stores, they are forever locked into only using music players from that one company. Or, if they buy a specific player, they are locked into buying music only from that company锟斤拷s music store. Is this true? Let锟斤拷s look at the data for iPods and the iTunes store 锟紺 they are the industry锟斤拷s most popular products and we have accurate data for them. Through the end of 2006, customers purchased a total of 90 million iPods and 2 billion songs from the iTunes store. On average, that锟斤拷s 22 songs purchased from the iTunes store for each iPod ever sold.
Today锟斤拷s most popular iPod holds 1000 songs, and research tells us that the average iPod is nearly full. This means that only 22 out of 1000 songs, or under 3% of the music on the average iPod, is purchased from the iTunes store and protected with a DRM. The remaining 97% of the music is unprotected and playable on any player that can play the open formats. It锟斤拷s hard to believe that just 3% of the music on the average iPod is enough to lock users into buying only iPods in the future. And since 97% of the music on the average iPod was not purchased from the iTunes store, iPod users are clearly not locked into the iTunes store to acquire their music.
The second alternative is for Apple to license its FairPlay DRM technology to current and future competitors with the goal of achieving interoperability between different company锟斤拷s players and music stores. On the surface, this seems like a good idea since it might offer customers increased choice now and in the future. And Apple might benefit by charging a small licensing fee for its FairPlay DRM. However, when we look a bit deeper, problems begin to emerge. The most serious problem is that licensing a DRM involves disclosing some of its secrets to many people in many companies, and history tells us that inevitably these secrets will leak. The Internet has made such leaks far more damaging, since a single leak can be spread worldwide in less than a minute. Such leaks can rapidly result in software programs available as free downloads on the Internet which will disable the DRM protection so that formerly protected songs can be played on unauthorized players.
An equally serious problem is how to quickly repair the damage caused by such a leak. A successful repair will likely involve enhancing the music store software, the music jukebox software, and the software in the players with new secrets, then transferring this updated software into the tens (or hundreds) of millions of Macs, Windows PCs and players already in use. This must all be done quickly and in a very coordinated way. Such an undertaking is very difficult when just one company controls all of the pieces. It is near impossible if multiple companies control separate pieces of the puzzle, and all of them must quickly act in concert to repair the damage from a leak.
Apple has concluded that if it licenses FairPlay to others, it can no longer guarantee to protect the music it licenses from the big four music companies. Perhaps this same conclusion contributed to Microsoft锟斤拷s recent decision to switch their emphasis from an 锟斤拷open锟斤拷 model of licensing their DRM to others to a 锟斤拷closed锟斤拷 model of offering a proprietary music store, proprietary jukebox software and proprietary players.
The third alternative is to abolish DRMs entirely. Imagine a world where every online store sells DRM-free music encoded in open licensable formats. In such a world, any player can play music purchased from any store, and any store can sell music which is playable on all players. This is clearly the best alternative for consumers, and Apple would embrace it in a heartbeat. If the big four music companies would license Apple their music without the requirement that it be protected with a DRM, we would switch to selling only DRM-free music on our iTunes store. Every iPod ever made will play this DRM-free music.
Why would the big four music companies agree to let Apple and others distribute their music without using DRM systems to protect it? The simplest answer is because DRMs haven锟斤拷t worked, and may never work, to halt music piracy. Though the big four music companies require that all their music sold online be protected with DRMs, these same music companies continue to sell billions of CDs a year which contain completely unprotected music. That锟斤拷s right! No DRM system was ever developed for the CD, so all the music distributed on CDs can be easily uploaded to the Internet, then (illegally) downloaded and played on any computer or player.
In 2006, under 2 billion DRM-protected songs were sold worldwide by online stores, while over 20 billion songs were sold completely DRM-free and unprotected on CDs by the music companies themselves. The music companies sell the vast majority of their music DRM-free, and show no signs of changing this behavior, since the overwhelming majority of their revenues depend on selling CDs which must play in CD players that support no DRM system.
So if the music companies are selling over 90 percent of their music DRM-free, what benefits do they get from selling the remaining small percentage of their music encumbered with a DRM system? There appear to be none. If anything, the technical expertise and overhead required to create, operate and update a DRM system has limited the number of participants selling DRM protected music. If such requirements were removed, the music industry might experience an influx of new companies willing to invest in innovative new stores and players. This can only be seen as a positive by the music companies.
Much of the concern over DRM systems has arisen in European countries. Perhaps those unhappy with the current situation should redirect their energies towards persuading the music companies to sell their music DRM-free. For Europeans, two and a half of the big four music companies are located right in their backyard. The largest, Universal, is 100% owned by Vivendi, a French company. EMI is a British company, and Sony BMG is 50% owned by Bertelsmann, a German company. Convincing them to license their music to Apple and others DRM-free will create a truly interoperable music marketplace. Apple will embrace this wholeheartedly.
锟斤拷 锟斤拷锟斤拷 锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷 February 8, 2007 03:51 PM
锟斤拷锟斤拷
锟街帮拷锟姐换锟斤拷片锟剿o拷
uu同学说锟斤拷原锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟姐本锟斤拷没锟叫的★拷野锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷么锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟剿★拷
锟斤拷 Ex 锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷 February 11, 2007 12:27 PM
锟斤拷锟斤拷为锟斤拷说锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷片锟窖匡拷
锟斤拷 -2 锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷 February 12, 2007 12:22 AM
锟饺憋拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟芥。锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷
锟斤拷 Martin 锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷 February 12, 2007 04:52 AM
锟斤拷-2同学锟姐不锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷也锟斤拷锟斤拷么锟斤拷么锟斤拷锟斤拷
锟斤拷 Ex 锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷 February 13, 2007 08:52 PM
BTW锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟杰撅拷锟矫匡拷要锟斤拷锟斤拷锟揭碉拷锟斤拷锟剿★拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷
锟斤拷 Martin 锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷 February 14, 2007 05:53 AM
锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷微锟矫碉拷,原锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷么锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷小锟绞碉拷锟斤拷锟斤拷,锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟角诧拷锟斤拷没PS锟缴撅拷,锟斤拷锟斤拷锟节碉拷锟剿猴拷一锟斤拷
锟斤拷 -2 锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷 February 14, 2007 01:29 PM
锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟剿硷拷Steve锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷耍锟斤拷锟斤拷遣锟斤拷锟斤拷说锟酵э拷锟斤拷锟斤拷恰锟?/p>
锟斤拷 underland 锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷 February 15, 2007 04:09 PM
小锟绞碉拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷什么锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷谓锟斤拷野锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟侥革拷源么锟斤拷锟揭撅拷锟斤拷锟斤拷应锟矫把匡拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷些锟斤拷模锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷装锟斤拷片锟矫筹拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟剿★拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟角革拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟杰匡拷锟缴帮拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷甙桑锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟矫葱★拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷
锟斤拷同学锟斤拷锟劫诧拷锟斤拷锟铰o拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷也锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷为锟斤拷锟侥的革拷锟捷碉拷之一锟剿★拷
锟斤拷 Ex 锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷 February 16, 2007 01:25 PM
锟斤拷锟斤拷咋锟斤拷没锟斤拷锟斤拷锟截o拷锟斤拷锟斤拷steve同学锟斤拷一锟斤拷一锟接帮拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷锟轿伙拷茫锟斤拷锟斤拷平拥墓锟角猴拷锟?/p>
锟斤拷 charcoal 锟斤拷锟斤拷锟斤拷 February 17, 2007 03:05 PM